Every single year, we rediscover the same frustration.
Test scores aren’t where we want them to be.
Student behavior feels harder to manage.
Mental health needs are rising.
Teachers are exhausted.
And once again, we turn to schools and ask them to fix it…by themselves.
We ask schools to solve poverty without addressing wages or housing.
We ask schools to heal trauma without stable healthcare or community support.
We ask schools to build civic trust while modeling political dysfunction at every level of government.
Then we criticize them when they fall short.
This pattern is not new—but it has become much more dangerous in our society as currently constructed.
Public schools sit at the intersection of nearly every social issue we are unwilling to confront directly. When families struggle, schools feel it. When communities fracture, classrooms absorb the tension. When society avoids hard conversations, educators are expected to carry them quietly, carefully, and without controversy.
And yet, schools were never designed to be the sole repair mechanism for society’s failures.
That truth does not absolve schools of responsibility. It clarifies it.
Public schools matter deeply. They remain one of the most powerful stabilizing institutions in a child’s life. For many students, school is the most predictable place they know—the most consistent set of adults, the safest routine in an otherwise unstable world.
But expecting schools to compensate for everything society refuses to address is not leadership. It is avoidance.
We cannot keep demanding higher outcomes while ignoring the conditions that shape them. We cannot talk about accountability in isolation from opportunity. We cannot place the full weight of social repair on classrooms and then starve them of trust, resources, and support.
This tension shows up most clearly in how we talk about children.
When students struggle, the language shifts quickly: discipline, rigor, resilience. Rarely do we pause to ask what they are carrying—or why public schools have become the place where all of that weight lands.
Educators understand this reality well. Many show up each day doing work far beyond their job descriptions: counselor, social worker, mediator, first responder. They do it not because policy demands it, but because children need it.
But goodwill is not a system.
Sacrifice is not a strategy.
And burnout is not a badge of honor.
If we want public schools to succeed, we must stop treating them as a convenient catch-all for every unresolved societal failure. That requires honesty—from policymakers, from communities, and from leaders—about what schools can do and what they cannot do alone.
It also requires a shift in how we measure success.
Not everything that matters shows up in a data dashboard. Not every meaningful outcome is immediate or easily quantified. Sometimes success looks like a student staying connected. A teacher staying one more year. A school holding steady in the middle of chaos.
Those moments matter—even if they don’t make headlines.
And this is where the conversation must become more honest.
If we are serious about the future of this country, we must be serious about the future of public schools.
Public schools are asked to hold together what society keeps pulling apart. They are expected to serve every child—regardless of income, immigration status, disability, language, trauma, or family circumstance—while operating inside a political climate that is increasingly corrosive to their work. They are scrutinized, legislated, and politicized in ways that make stability nearly impossible.
At the same time, the resources that allow schools to be effective are steadily stripped away.
Funding is cut or capped.
Supports are reduced.
Mandates increase.
Public schools are told to innovate while being constrained. To raise outcomes while absorbing more need. To remain neutral while navigating political narratives that cast educators as adversaries rather than allies.
This erosion matters.
When politics becomes more punitive than supportive, schools lose the ability to do their best work. When funding decisions are driven by ideology rather than impact, students pay the price. When public schools are treated as battlegrounds instead of civic investments, trust fractures—and once trust is gone, improvement becomes far harder to sustain.
And yet, public schools persist.
They persist because educators show up. Because communities still believe in the promise of shared responsibility. Because despite everything, public schools remain one of the last places where democracy is practiced daily—imperfectly, but earnestly.
But persistence should not be mistaken for resilience without limit.
Public schools cannot continue to absorb the consequences of corrosive politics and deliberate disinvestment without damage. At some point, asking them to do more while giving them less stops being unrealistic and becomes irresponsible.
If we want public schools to be places of possibility, we must stop undermining the very conditions that allow them to succeed. That means confronting the politics that erode trust, protecting the funding that sustains impact, and acknowledging—honestly—that schools cannot fix alone what society continues to break.
Until we do, we will keep demanding miracles from public schools while quietly dismantling the foundation on which they stand.

I don’t know if you remember this, but it was a quiet erosion. They introduced Sex-Ed into the schools. It was a mandatory class that was added to the curriculum because teenaged girls were still getting pregnant. STDs were still a major problem. SOMETHING HAD TO BE DONE! What happened? Red-faced teachers began to comply. Sure enough, the pregnancy rate started to drop. Sex-ed was something that used to be provided by parents. Unintentional consequences?
Parents are not equipped to teach children. It should be left to the professionals. If the child didn’t conform to societal norms, then, it was the parents’ fault. WE FIXED IT! Parents believed they weren’t qualified and so didn’t make any attempt. When “new math” came in, parents looked at this more complicated process and threw-up their hands…leave it to the pros. In loco parentis became “better than parents.” The schools were the experts. All they had to do was teach character, math, English, social studies, history, multiple languages, philosophy, psychology, fine arts, teamwork, sports and physical fitness, and all the sciences. Parents dropped off their kids in Kindergarten and they came out as seniors with knowledge, skill, and social responsibility. Until they didn’t. What conclusion did we come to?
Teachers are not equipped to teach children. They must go to school for 5 years to get the degree, then, after interning and student teaching have been passed, must take a state certification that guarantees that every teacher can teach every subject. ??? And when they can’t, they have wasted all that tuition, room and board, and 5 years of their lives because they cannot teach the Heisenberg Principle to their kindergarteners. And they’re $40K+ in debt.
So the teachers we have in place have taken on the responsibilities of the Parents and the Society in addition to their subject matter expertise. If something’s wrong with the graduates, it’s the teachers’ fault. More and more teachers find this an untenable situation and leave. Others, as mentioned above, never get started.
If Education is this critical, why are teachers disrespected and labeled as incompetent when the requirements are so far removed from the capacity of the schools? Why, if the government throws money with strings attached, does it not improve the situation? Why would anyone volunteer to be threatened, assaulted, berated, denigrated, and blamed for things not under their control for poor pay, for the very society that has demanded excellence and then refused to support the teachers’ efforts, and then made them pariahs??
You highlight a lot of the angst that exists in schools and some of the things we need to address better from a societal perspective. As school leaders, we must position ourselves to support teachers to the best degree possible and to advocate vehemently when legislation is being considered. It will take a collaborative, strategic effort and we have to do a much better job of investing in teachers and of making our chosen field of profession the noble occupation that it is. Thank you for your very thoughtful comments!